Are Cryptocurrencies Comparable to Stocks and Bonds? Courts Near a Decision

The cryptocurrency industry has been envisioning digital coins as an alternate finance world that operates outside the control of big banks and government regulators. As digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ether became more popular, the crypto industry has hit a legal hurdle with the Howey Test. This legal analysis determines when a financial product becomes subject to the same strict rules as stocks and bonds.

The crypto industry has fought back and found itself in a gray legal zone with an uncertain future in the United States. Federal judges recently weighed in on a series of lawsuits by the nation’s top securities regulator against some of the largest crypto firms. Precedent-setting rulings are expected in the coming weeks.

The court fights over the last 18 months have seen the Securities and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) suing crypto companies for operating as unregulated securities businesses. Both sides have had early court victories, but encounters with the commission have become more decisive. Judges held hearings in cases against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance, which could be central in the broader legal battle, with preliminary rulings expected soon.

The S.E.C.’s lawsuit against Ripple had received significant attention, and in a July ruling, a federal judge in New York ruled that Ripple’s cryptocurrency did not qualify as a security. In contrast, a judge in another case endorsed the S.E.C.’s view that a different set of cryptocurrencies qualified as securities, casting uncertainty.

This is when federal judges held hearings in cases against Coinbase and Binance, which serve as marketplaces for dozens of digital currencies. Both cases revolve around the applicability of the Howey Test to digital currencies. While lawyers for Coinbase have criticized the S.E.C. for trying to stretch the intent of the Howey Test to cover crypto investments, lawyers for Ripple have expressed concern about the S.E.C.’s strategy and pressed the government lawyers to explain the boundaries of their argument.

The battle has become crucial for the future of the crypto industry in the U.S. If the S.E.C. prevails, it will likely stifle the growth of the industry. On the other hand, the government insists that robust oversight is necessary to prevent rampant fraud in the crypto market.

It remains to be seen what the decisions in these cases will mean for the future of the cryptocurrency industry in the U.S.


Moms Managing Girl Influencers: A Marketplace Stalked by Men

Elissa began receiving threatening messages early last year from a person calling themselves “Instamodelfan” targeting her daughter’s Instagram account. Despite having over 100,000 followers, the account has been under scrutiny for potentially exploiting children in exchange for money. However, the issue runs deeper than that. Research from The New York Times found that the platform […]

Read More

Insights from The Times’s Investigation of Child Influencers

Instagram maintains the 13-year-old minimum age for accounts, but parents can take control, largely for their daughters’ ambitions to become influencers. Parents initiate their child’s modeling career or gain favor from clothing brands, but a dark subculture emerges, controlled by men attracted to minors, as per The New York Times. The emergence of mom-run profiles […]

Read More

Rising Threat: China’s Growing Cyber Espionage and the New Vulnerability

Beijing’s Networks Expanding Hacking Efforts China has spread its hacking reach with new tools that exploit computer vulnerabilities and a network of contracted vendors. The large scale of China’s hacking operations poses a significant threat, with the FBI reporting China’s hacking program to be larger than all major nations combined. The U.S. has tracked consistent […]

Read More